Post #2361763
2026-04-12 03:29 UTC
Replies (4)
-
@dohpaz42@lemmy.world 2026-04-13 02:49
This was posted (and reported) before the rule change, and I removed it due to it's non-"family friendly" nature. There were a couple of other posts that I removed for similar reasons. Now, if you would like to repost it with the appropriate NSFW tag, you're welcome to do so now that the rules officially support this content.
-
@helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world 2026-04-12 13:32
Personally I think it should be tagged nsfw. I like the metric I came up with the other day. > If you'd get arrested for showing it to a 16yr old, tag it. If you'd shoot your "creepy uncle" for showing it to your 16yr old kid, tag it. It's not that I think a 16yr old isn't mature enough for this type of material, but it's a lot different if a much older person shares it with them. When in doubt - tag it.
-
@Harvey656@lemmy.world 2026-04-12 18:43
It looksnlike the bottom of that was cut off, where attribution would usually be. I never removed it, but I would say that could be the reason. And maybe no NSFW tag, thats.... spicy?
-
@GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 2026-04-13 16:21
