Post #2361001
2026-05-10 07:33 UTC
@olivia@scholar.social @CyberneticForests@assemblag.es Statement 3 is my favourite: similarity through obscurity.
I don't understand A, I don't understand B, therefore A is similar to B.
A fallacy that can't even be called logical.
Replies (3)
-
@olivia@scholar.social 2026-05-10 08:47
@mapto@masto.bg @CyberneticForests@assemblag.es it's so common tho, depressing
-
@librarysquirrel@sunny.garden 2026-05-10 08:50
@mapto@masto.bg @olivia@scholar.social @CyberneticForests@assemblag.es damn, an "illogical fallacy" is so 2026
-
@drj@typo.social 2026-05-10 08:51
@mapto@masto.bg @olivia@scholar.social @CyberneticForests@assemblag.es a lot of Searle's thinking is like that.