Post #2357571
2026-04-24 12:08 UTC
>Of course, I am constantly observing the world and getting three-dimensional sensory feedback about it. This is part of why I need fewer extent works of art to study. But it's also giving me something that the current state of 'AI' cannot achieve: the multi-modular, sensory, high-level analysis that gives rise to understanding.
That sees one butt and another butt and understands in what ways they are similar even if they look quite different.
A machine-learning model can learn to>
Replies (1)
-
@rubyjones@wandering.shop 2026-04-24 12:12
>sort and replicate shapes and tag some similar ones with the label 'butts' - you can train it to do that. But it can never *recognise* (re-cognise) a butt. It cannot get to know butts. And it certainly can't be attracted to butts. Which is why you get these (to a human) obvious gaffs where limbs start merging with the scenery, or there are too many of them. Because the machine doesn't have a concept of butts. It has millions upon millions of example images that it can deliver approximately>