Post #2315645
2026-04-20 23:26 UTC
We are in a new editorial cycle for ActivityPub, so if anyone thinks these or other parts of the spec are underspecified, they should be opening issues on the ActivityPub repo right now!
https://github.com/w3c/activitypub/issues
@strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz @smallcircles@social.coop @benpate@mastodon.social @deutrino@mstdn.io @bengo@mastodon.social
Replies (1)
-
@benpate@mastodon.social 2026-04-20 23:29
Yeah, the new work on ActivityPub is encouraging. Will this be a version 2.1? Or something bigger like a 3.0? For me, the biggest opportunities might be to pull some of the FEPs into the spec, for instance, blessing some of the Threadiverse work as the official way to handle groups and discussions. Is is possible that some FEPs might make their ways into the specs? @evan@cosocial.ca @strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz @smallcircles@social.coop @deutrino@mstdn.io @bengo@mastodon.social