Post #2310628
2025-11-19 10:59 UTC
Frustrating to see new #IETF drafts and mailing list discussions etc. continuing to use legacy IPv4 in the examples with no mention of #IPv6
Normalize IPv6 by using it in your documentation and examples. The same goes for #OpenSource projects.
It would be nice if, at least within the IETF standards body itself, we could start dancing like it's 1998 🕺
Replies (4)
-
@hisold@toot.io 2025-11-19 12:10
@dentangle@chaos.social We need IPv4 shaming. IPv4 is bad, mkay?
-
@forwardingplane@social.ipv6.army 2025-11-19 15:57
@dentangle@chaos.social context? Which drafts?
-
@nivex@tenforward.social 2025-11-19 20:24
@dentangle@chaos.social It's almost like they don't read their own documents. RFC 6540, anyone?
-
@jima@mspsocial.net 2025-11-22 23:39
@dentangle@chaos.social 1998? Why does nobody acknowledge RFC 1883? 🥲