Post #2305861
2026-03-24 00:51 UTC
@seachanger@alaskan.social Regarding item #5: https://www.npr.org/2025/09/05/nx-s1-5529404/anthropic-settlement-authors-copyright-ai
It's important to note, though, that the ruling walks a fine line: training of Claude was considered to be "fair use" (not a ruling I personally agree with but hey), however, the fact that Anthropic pirated all the materials was not. Anthropic settled on this claim rather than take it to trial, it seems.
Replies (2)
-
@aud@fire.asta.lgbt 2026-03-24 01:09
@seachanger@alaskan.social speaking to maybe 6 and 7: not all that is sold as “AI” is actually AI, which isn’t quite what I had in mind while looking for privacy and safety concerns but it’s certainly related https://data-workers.org/france/
-
@danwwilson@rstats.me 2026-03-25 04:41
@aud@fire.asta.lgbt @seachanger@alaskan.social I was going to suggest a rewording as courts have deemed it isn’t theft to use it (also disagree with the courts) but maybe indicating that materials for training are often collected in a way that is illegal and has actively seen citizens prosecuted in the past.