Post #2211040
2026-04-28 01:33 UTC
For a security standpoint, it sounds like your company is exposing everyone to a huge data breach if this gets leaked. And that's assuming Flock has your best interests at heart to begin with. Imagine what an attacker could learn by identifying the nanes, faces, and checkin times of everybody that worked at your company. Nothing good, that's for sure.
Replies (1)
-
@Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz 2026-04-28 11:07
If the company itself has a data leak, then the company itself would be fully liable, but if they hand the data off to Flock and Flock has the data leak, then that liability would be shared. I'm entirely anti-Flock, but shared liability for data breaches and—more importantly—potentially lower per-camera monitoring costs (versus hiring full-time security personnel), might be reasons it was employed in this situation.