Post #2194966
2026-04-15 00:32 UTC
@foxyoreos@gulp.cafe I'd imagine because we don't require CWs on diaper pictures and blocking our server's media seemed less invasive than a full on limit.
Replies (1)
-
@foxyoreos@gulp.cafe 2026-04-15 05:10
@Rusty@cubhub.social oh, that's more fair then. I've been in taxes all day so I didn't have the energy to follow up or think about it, but it did confuse me because I thought the two instances got along pretty well.<3 Speaking of things Mastodon could implement that would be helpful, server-based content warnings instance maintainers could add.. Also regex based auto-expand/hide for content warnings at the account level.