Post #2099388
2026-04-23 15:43 UTC
@hipsterelectron @khinsen @civodul Yeah, judging from the cross-section of provided citations, a distinction between "considered the issues without an unambiguous conclusion", "said LLM use might be okay" and "oh no this is going to turn into a steaming pile of shit isn't it" might be useful
Replies (1)
-
@hipsterelectron@circumstances.run 2026-04-23 15:46
@HaTetsu @khinsen @civodul yeah i didn't follow up because i became a little embarrassed but while "uses llm review" was quite precise i really really most care about whether it accepts llm contributions and i can't imagine why that's not made clear—i'm concerned it was done to feed sensationalist interpretations