Post #2017407
2026-05-04 19:24 UTC
@b0rk @njonsson
As someone who has only ever written (albeit really basic and/or crappy) CSS directly, and who knows _what_ Tailwind provides, what was the rationale for bailing on Tailwind?
It seems like some of the convenience functions like handling rlt or ltr, or dynamic/resolution layouts etc. are handy, but mostly seems like extra complexity for only a little benefit.
Replies (1)
-
@b0rk@social.jvns.ca 2026-05-04 19:27
@tezoatlipoca @njonsson so the way i was using tailwind involved including a 2MB css file on every page and that's obviously inefficient haha combo of that plus I'm better at CSS now so I can use vanilla CSS better now, and there's more flexibility with regular CSS obviously (the way i was using tailwind is not how you're _supposed_ to use it, but I did not want to use it the right way)