Post #1996048
2026-05-03 00:51 UTC
Replies (6)
-
@0xC01DC0FFEE@bytearray.eu 2026-05-03 01:02
@hailey@hails.org Classic case of "I was right about something unrelated decades ago, therefore I am very smart and can't be wrong about random bullshit", I guess
-
@deepfryed@fosstodon.org 2026-05-03 01:03
@hailey@hails.org Clarke's 3rd law with the caveat "sufficiently advanced for reasoning abilities of the person involved"
-
@airshipper@cloudisland.nz 2026-05-03 02:08
@hailey@hails.org oh no is this why people are talking about dawkins? so predictable in retrospect
-
@bololacertus@mstdn.mx 2026-05-03 03:03
@hailey@hails.org Dude is about 80 years old now. What's next? Using toddlers to test how deceptive tech can be receiving? Or trying to invalidate his previous work because he got old?
-
@thestrangelet@beige.party 2026-05-05 02:51
@hailey@hails.org "The Claude Delusion"
-
@sarna@types.pl 2026-05-06 20:58
@hailey@hails.org he tried to do away with it entirely and ended up living as an inversion of it