Post #1961157
2026-04-27 08:10 UTC
Replies (3)
-
@sterpeto@social.vivaldi.net 2026-04-27 08:22
@m3tti@functional.cafe I'm not a professional developer so I'm a little bit biased, but I don't understand the appeal of frameworks. The time you spend learning what it is in fact a new language and abstraction is better spent mastering what you're already using. And despite that the framework is a constantly moving target. We're not learning tools to make things anymore, we're learning tools to make tools to make more tools, abstraction over abstraction instead of focusing on the problem at hand and solve it. GenAI is making things worse.
-
@bedardbrandon928@mastodon.social 2026-04-27 08:39
@m3tti@functional.cafe https://open.substack.com/pub/brandonbedard/p/the-omniverse-eternal-fortress-why?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=7qos2e
-
@evgandr@mastodon.bsd.cafe 2026-04-27 17:35
@m3tti@functional.cafe Maybe itbis a bit silly to answer to this question with a meme. Anyway, I think that there are at least two kinds of developers: who depicted on the left side of attached meme (and who happy to turn open software into the open #slopware and perform other … uhm … strange things). And who on the right side of this meme. Also, I read in someones blog about another way to classify developers: there are one who are "Builders" — they just want to see the working thing, no matter how ugly it is inside; they didn't like programming and see it as a sad way to make the desired things. And there are "Artists" — people who have fun from the process (of programming); sometimes they build something as a result, sometimes not, but in both cases it is a well-spent time. So, I think, the folks like in the left side of meme and the "Builders" will be happy to replace joys of programming with LLMs and other big tech dependencies, bc they don't see these joys, first.