Post #1916988
2026-04-25 20:13 UTC
@madsenandersc I think there's a genuine chance to tell when a post shows up in an LLM model and it had a field that said "don't train LLMs with this post".
The rest of the enforcement work is about figuring out if the scraper could have seen that field and chose to ignore it.
Even if posts can be exposed through applications that filter out the field, it could be possible to prove that an LLM (or ad profiling) has been using data from the source, hence had access to the field.
Replies (1)
-
@benjaoming@social.data.coop 2026-04-25 20:15
@madsenandersc The other part of my reasoning is to say: If we don't declare anything, then we've just lost from the beginning. We SHOULD find a way to declare the consent of data sharing wrt. the ActivityPub protocol. Otherwise we have NOTHING. Like literally nothing? Do you know of any kind of existing restriction?