Post #1822130

2026-04-30 22:27 UTC

Yeah, that’s super fair. Both have a place. Beyond is something different as a novelty if you already eat meat; I’d liken it to a non-vegan using agave over honey. For vegetarians/vegans, it’s nice to have basically a 1:1 if you want it. Even for vegans and vegetarians, it’s valid to prefer Beyond over that 1:1 replica. And for non-vegetarians trying to be more climate-conscious or a bit less unhealthy (Impossible is far from healthy – its saturated fat content, for example, is nearly as bad as ground beef’s – but it’s also less likely to give you colorectal etc. cancer), it’s a reasonable choice.

Replies (1)

@anon6789@lemmy.world 2026-05-01 00:51

There is absolutely a place for both products. Impossible did exactly what they set out to do in flavor and texture mimicry. It’s the one I tried first as a meat eater and that’s what got me to try Beyond and a few others. I hear the complaints about the fat and sodium in the products, and while it sounds less than ideal due a vegan or vegetarian diet, it doesn’t sound that bad for an omnivore, especially one that eats less veg. The great thing about them being a manufactured product is both of those things can change through product development. I remember reading that Impossible went through numerous revisions to stand up to Burger King’s conveyor belt grill system. I’m very excited for the future of these types of products.

Open ##1826388