Elektrine lite

← Feed

@fenrasulfr@lemmy.world

Post #1755086

2026-04-18 22:13 UTC

If I am not severly mistaken from reading all of this. The point he was trying to make is a phrase like “All men commit sexual assault.” Which can quite easily be disproven will give ammunition to the vile men like Andrew Tate to draw in young men that feel like they are being labeled as a criminal.

Replies (1)

  • “straight women love SAing queer people” “All men commit sexual assault.” When was that word ‘all’ added, do you think? I don’t remember seeing it. You’re correct, that would be easily disprovable. Andrew Tate, by the way, does not need ammunition; he will freely invent the ammunition he needs. Those men, also, are perfectly comfortable jumping onto incel boards to complain about how femoids only want high sexual market value—nary a concern about how any of this language may or may not be unfair. Listen, the whole problem is, the reason why I’m here, is that if you listen to these people then you never get to make cultural critiques. Martin Luther King never gets to talk about the white moderate because Not All White Moderates are like that, you know? You have to learn to identify when people are just disingenuously deflecting. Most of these men do not care about the fairness of this language; it is piss easy to figure out when someone is talking about a class demographic vs. its individual members. The thing they care about is never dealing with the subject. They’re just protecting their cultural capital. There are other ways of dealing with Andrew Tate’s followers: you call them stupid and you make fun of them for it because they are and they deserve it. And I hear you, “how is being mean effective?” But I’ll tell you, no one likes being on the side of the uncool.

    Open ##1755085