Post #1656745
2026-04-25 06:01 UTC
Replies (3)
-
@rmikke@en.osm.town 2026-04-25 10:39
@fdroidorg@floss.social It's about some p0rn, right?
-
@miterosan_ist@horny.jetzt 2026-04-25 21:56
@fdroidorg@floss.social Do you now exclude apps that allow brosing porn books? The link to the policy does not really convey why these now are specifically excluded. Still sad to hear. While yes, you could create an repository for nsfw apps, you loose the institution and reputation of fdroid main goals (reproducable etc). Would have preffered to have this behind a filter on the main repos.
-
@Atemu@darmstadt.social 2026-04-26 05:46
@fdroidorg@floss.social I'd rather you didn't force your moral standards upon your users. Especially not with lazy excuses such as "protecting children" or "just set up your own F-droid repo". These completely fail to consider that not every user is a child and that what makes F-droid desirable is its status as an independent software distribution, not the technical details of the protocol. There already exists a mechanism to express moral preference filters for apps: anti-features. Use those instead.