Post #1630623
2026-04-24 12:58 UTC
See, this is the problem again. The form of socialist society that exists in Korea is one that was formed through direct practice and based on Korea’s existing situation. It’s what works for them, regardless of whether or not you approve of the “model.” You’re saying it isn’t “promising,” more gesturing to potentials of misconduct that you percieve based on your own comparison to the ideal, perfect, impossible version of socialism that exists purely in imagination.
The problem rests on your belief that you know better than the millions of people in the DPRK over the last century how to run their country, without doing the study to see how and why their structures were formed. For example, the Democratic Front is an integral part to their socialist democracy, and this has heritage in liberation from colonialism by Japan. The various councils and committees have heritage in the culture formed in Korea and were solidified into a state.
Then, you go and strawman people and misrepresent them. Though you maintain a polite tone, your actual actions speak against that, and thus you aren’t acting in a comradely way like you first seemed to be. It’s frustrating.
Replies (1)
-
@Dragon@lemmy.ml 2026-04-24 13:06
The problem rests on your belief that you know better than the millions of people in the DPRK That’s only true if you assume the government is actually a representation of the will of the DPRK. How am I supposed to know whether that’s true other than evaluating the quality of their democratic system? Though you maintain a polite tone, your actual actions speak against that What actions have I taken that are upsetting?