Post #1620394
2026-03-18 03:48 UTC
Replies (3)
-
@SuperMoosie@mastodon.au 2026-03-18 03:58
@ai6yr Snap! https://mastodon.au/@SuperMoosie/116246839548001282
-
@whybird@aus.social 2026-03-18 04:14
@ai6yr It’s the exact opposite of the Tullock's spike thought experiment. “…in which Tullock suggested that if governments were serious about reducing road casualties, they should mandate that a sharp spike be installed in the center of each car's steering wheel, to increase the probability that an accident would be fatal to the driver. Tullock's idea was that the normal process of risk compensation would then lead to safer driving by the affected drivers, thereby actually reducing driving fatalities.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gordon_Tullock?wprov=sfti1#Tullock's_spike
-
@johannab@cosocial.ca 2026-03-18 04:20
@ai6yr every time This publication comes to mind: https://how.complexsystems.fail As does a Human Factors lecture I attended last century (ugh) on the amount of money spent on psychological research to make fighter plane cockpits human-goof-proof, ON TOP of the extended, intense, and repeated training pilots go through. One of the points in the early 90's was cars were becoming too complex for mere untrained humans to cope with, with next to no thought about the human-tech interface required.