Post #1578933
2026-04-21 23:06 UTC
Replies (5)
-
@InsertUser@en.osm.town 2026-04-22 09:08
@webmink nah, the'll just do their usual nonsense along the lines of: You can absolutely read them for free, for up to two hours at a time, having booked in in advance to travel to our reading room in the most expensive city to get to in the county.
-
@alisonw@hachyderm.io 2026-04-22 10:53
@webmink Only £125! https://www.screwfix.com/p/iet-bs-7671-2018-a4-2026-18th-edition-amendment-4-wiring-regulations-requirements-for-electrical-installations
-
@IvanSanchez@mastodon.social 2026-04-22 11:49
@webmink I'm doing some follow-up work on the BOSCO ruling (TL;DR: If a program implements a law, the source code must be accesible; https://civio.es/novedades/2025/11/17/this-is-the-landmark-ruling-that-sets-a-new-standard-for-algorithmic-transparency-in-spain/ ). Could you please point me to more EU rulings about standards and/or source code? I'd like to build a good list for further reference/action in the future.
-
@adamshostack@infosec.exchange 2026-04-22 14:52
@webmink ISO what you did there!
-
@jones@mvm.lol 2026-04-22 17:23
@webmink I assume this will result in laws referencing "Common standards that reflect the state of the art", rather than naming them outright. Are there provisions preventing this?