Post #1546514

@whitequark @tedmielczarek @regehr yeah I'm just suggesting that the current version of it where you check in `max-threads=4` is somehow even worse since it has all the same problems plus it's static for all hardware. `max-threads=max(1, min(num-cpus, system-memory / 4GiB))` feels like a concrete improvement, even if it retains many of the same flaws. But I do broadly agree that a much better option would be to fix things in a way that also handles the dynamic nature of resource availability.