Post #1520707
2026-04-17 14:36 UTC
@florian I can make that work. So you say, a PR for this could get accepted? That would be great.
I’ll wait to see if there’s any feedback from my native expert.
Replies (1)
-
@florian@typo.social 2026-04-17 20:26
@justvanrossum Would be accepted, if there is a language expert backing it. Georg’s idea for that repo was to collaborate on a common naming/categorizing scheme since there is nothing* else for glyphs like there is for characters with Unicode. (Note it’s GlyphData.xml and not GlyphsData.xml, so not bound to any editor). Also, it would be good to know if there is a need for unencoded glyphs that are used by shaping. * Besides the limited Adobe Glyph List [for New Fonts]