@stefan_hessbrueggen@fedihum.org
Post #1502605
2026-03-28 12:40 UTC
@christof this looks a bit shady: no peer review, no clearly indicated publisher, no editors. I don't want to convince you that it's not worth the trouble, but my gut feeling tells me that reading this stuff may leave you disappointed.
Replies (1)
-
@christof@fedihum.org 2026-03-28 12:59
@stefan_hessbrueggen You are probably right. I mean, I know from the abstract that I am going to be disappointed, because they used Scopus data, where e.g. @jcls is not represented, afaik, and limited themselves to English-language sources. The conclusions formulated in the abstract likely follow from those choices, at least to some extent. But of course I want to be fair and read the paper before drawing any conclusions.