Post #1437754
2026-03-10 02:02 UTC
@kirb IMO this isn't necessarily a valid assumption, though I agree in the wild it probably has a high correlation to unreviewed commits.
I use Claude to author my commits mostly because it writes much more detailed commit messages than I would ever be bothered to. 😅
I still always look through the changes first, it's just the final commit that I tell Claude to write. Hell I even tell it to author the commit sometimes for my own manual code changes!
Replies (1)
-
@kirb@hachyderm.io 2026-03-10 02:12
@bwebster Your use of it seems reasonable, and there’s definitely plenty of people using these tools thoughtfully. It’s just getting increasingly difficult to trust that strangers working on projects I depend on aren’t letting their guard down on code quality. Particularly smaller projects that don’t have other eyes reviewing the code regularly. (Although, really, we should all be reviewing 3rd-party code we bring into our codebases. Maybe this is just a reality check that we’ve been lazy on that end of it for way too long.)