Post #1396014
2026-04-06 10:50 UTC
also for academics, they need to take certain facts seriously on LLMs:
1️⃣ LLMs are usefully seen as lossy content-addressable systems
2️⃣ we can't automatically detect plagiarism
3️⃣ LLMs automate plagiarism & paper mills
4️⃣ we must protect literature from pollution
5️⃣ LLM use is a CoI
6️⃣ prompts do not cause output in authorial sense
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/dkrgj_v1
13/
Replies (2)
-
@olivia@scholar.social 2026-04-06 10:53
Some of critical AI literacy is to say "did you know we can do science without so much interpersonal and structural harm?" The actual best source for all of this is Isabelle Stengers — and NO it's not just about slowing down and she in fact critiques that strongly in her book: https://www.politybooks.com/bookdetail?book_slug=another-science-is-possible-a-manifesto-for-slow-science---9781509521807 14/
-
@luminos@eupolicy.social 2026-04-06 12:19
@olivia > 5️⃣ LLM use is a CoI What is a "CoI"? Is there some part of a word missing? Thanks for the thread. You raised some important points.