Post #1385232
2026-04-19 03:52 UTC
Replies (6)
-
@NilaJones@zeroes.ca 2026-04-19 04:08
@theogrin TIL, this is how you say, 'Lol, no, not buying that for one minute!' in formal language
-
@Beachbum@mastodon.sdf.org 2026-04-19 05:29
@theogrin 💯
-
@JacobVardy@kolektiva.social 2026-04-19 05:38
@theogrin you get a hint with the first footnote: "Throughout their briefs and supporting documentation, Defendants use the term “sex-rejecting procedures.” In this Court all people will be treated with dignity. The Court will use the appropriate term “gender-affirming care.”"
-
@krans@mastodon.me.uk 2026-04-19 06:55
@theogrin I love this whole judgment. I'm sure that if I was on the plaintiffs' legal teams this would be a career highlight!
-
@haaflife@ohai.social 2026-04-19 08:11
@theogrin idk this gives more "I know this is completely pointless, my decision will be completely ignored, like all the other ones before". Which is good, I guess. The sooner people realise you can't sue your way out of fascist dictatorship, the sooner people can get armed and organised.
-
@itgrrl@infosec.exchange 2026-04-19 13:40
@theogrin delicious! thx for sharing 💕 I had to look it up, & found the opening para is also pretty 🔥 (“deeply unserious people” is how I would characterise almost every political appointee under the current US regime)