Elektrine lite

← Feed

@jcoglan@mastodon.social

Post #1364893

2026-03-01 23:45 UTC

RE: https://lingo.lol/@thedansimonson/116156498254821672 this is also why LLMs are not "another layer of abstraction". do you need to read the asm output of your compiler every time it runs? no, and having to do so would substantially reduce the value of said compiler

Replies (4)

  • @jcoglan@mastodon.social 2026-03-01 23:46

    this is also downstream of programmers not knowing what the word "abstraction" means. to the extent LLMs correspond to any existing software idea, they are indirection, and they are indirection that adds RNG to anything they're connected to

    Open ##1944155

  • @provuejim@techhub.social 2026-03-02 12:42

    @jcoglan Of course not, I read the machine code 🤣

    Open ##1944157

  • @pmorinerie@mastodon.xyz 2026-03-02 21:09

    @jcoglan @nicuveo yes, but… A while ago, I investigated using the SDCC compiler to write code for the Game Boy Color. I usually read and write Game Boy code in assembly (that’s how all the GB games were written back then). So I know how to do basic things, how to write an idiomatic array enumeration, a handful of clever (and not really mandatory) assembly tricks, etc. That said, how nice would it be to write C – instead of spending hours at "how to multiply those numbers"? Well: it is awful.

    Open ##1944158

  • @jcoglan Some people solve that conflict by not reading the output of the LLM.

    Open ##1944170