Post #1331572
2026-02-03 17:24 UTC
@UlrikeHahn sounds a lot like how you envision arxiv, from your original post
Replies (2)
-
@zackbatist@archaeo.social 2026-02-03 17:27
@UlrikeHahn for me, the value of traditional peer review is in the potential for iteration based on peers’ feedback. It’s a way of engaging with the research community in a manner that focuses on a specific outcome
-
@UlrikeHahn@fediscience.org 2026-02-03 17:28
@zackbatist not sure what you mean here. I think the line of traditional peer review was much further into the substance than what basic quality control for preprints was ever meant to be