Post #1331573
2026-02-03 17:27 UTC
@UlrikeHahn for me, the value of traditional peer review is in the potential for iteration based on peers’ feedback. It’s a way of engaging with the research community in a manner that focuses on a specific outcome
Replies (1)
-
@UlrikeHahn@fediscience.org 2026-02-03 17:32
@zackbatist My sense is there’s probably a lot of disciplinary variation in the nature of peer review, historically. Peer review in psychology traditionally kind of took it upon itself to collaboratively rewrite your paper. Sometimes that made things better, but a lot of the time it felt (to me) like a very effortful sideways move….