Post #1316094
2023-08-22 13:59 UTC
Today @PeerJ published the paper 'The experiences of COVID-19 preprint authors: a survey of researchers about publishing and receiving feedback on their work during the pandemic' by Narmin Rzayeva, @SusanaOliHenriques, @stephenpinfield and myself https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15864.
This paper is a result of a project of @RoRInstitute in which we studied the response of the scholarly communication system to the COVID-19 pandemic https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.17125394.v1.
@cwts
Replies (1)
-
@LudoWaltman@social.cwts.nl 2023-08-22 14:05
In our paper we study the adoption of open forms of peer review and feedback in the context of COVID-19 research. Of course we made sure that the review reports for our paper are also openly available https://peerj.com/articles/15864/reviews/. We thank David Stern for serving as editor for our paper and Mario Malički, @KBiesenbender@openbiblio.social and an anonymous reviewer for their comments on our work. We were asked to make substantial improvements, which we believe has significantly strengthened the quality of our paper.