Post #1316091
2023-11-18 13:18 UTC
Interesting results in @digitalscience and @springernature #StateOfOpenData report https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.24428194.v1.
This graph shows a breakdown by field of the openness of survey respondents to four open science practices.
The pattern is almost the same for all fields: Researchers are most strongly in support of open access, followed by open data, then open peer review and finally preprinting.
Replies (1)
-
@jeroenbosman@akademienl.social 2023-11-18 14:45
@LudoWaltman@social.cwts.nl @digitalscience@sciencemastodon.com @springernature@bird.makeup very interesting indeed. It raises many questions, esp around stated peference, versus what we know about the actual uptake of practices in various fields. It also suggests that open peer review could catch on if it was more widely supported by authors.