Post #1307945
2025-11-16 11:43 UTC
@chrysn @jyasskin This RFC contains a nice analysis of the actual meaning of relation types like “alternate”, “bookmark”, “duplicate”, … https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8574.txt
Replies (1)
-
@chrysn@chaos.social 2025-11-16 12:18
@hvdsomp @jyasskin I was using alternate as a strawman; the actual relations probably need to be custom for this purpose, except for the RFC7089 mementos that IIRC describe that precise "A was archived at B" relation needed here in terms of web links.