Post #1307933
2025-11-15 20:02 UTC
Replies (3)
-
@hvdsomp@w3c.social 2025-11-15 20:42
@jyasskin @pointlessone yes, correct. we’re currently working with @internetarchive on an enhanced version of the Robust Links spec, which will need an updated, yet backwards compatible, implementation. The most significant challenge is to seamlessly get the annotations into html. Requires authoring/editing tool support.
-
@csarven@w3c.social 2025-11-16 07:23
@jyasskin @hvdsomp @pointlessone The notion of robust links is a must have. @dokieli https://dokie.li/ (source: https://git.dokie.li/ ) implemented Robust Links (c. 2017). Here are some screencasts: * Robustifying a collection of links: https://dokie.li/media/video/dokieli-robustify-links.webm * Citations: https://dokie.li/media/video/dokieli-citation.webm (part of the idea/work on "semantic citations": https://csarven.ca/linked-research-decentralised-web#semantic-citations - anything less in this day and age would be uncivilised) * Tabbing/view: https://dokie.li/media/video/dokieli-link-tabbing-hover-focus-click.webm
-
@hvdsomp@w3c.social 2025-11-16 12:00
@jyasskin @pointlessone A little context: Significant Memento infrastructure was operated as an official service of the LANL Research Library. That included a web archive aggregator (that leveraged Memento interoperability) covering the holdings of 30-ish web archives, Robust Links tools, and APIs for both. A few months ago, the Research Library decided to pull the plug on the infrastructure. There are contacts with @internetarchive aimed at resurrecting some components.