Post #1296355

2026-02-20 17:36 UTC

Lol. No it isn't. The batteries are only 53kw\h in size and they're using shitty NMC batteries instead of LFP (or other) batteries because they want the full $7,500 tax credit. $500 would more than make up for the aerodynamics. No manufacturers want to use those batteries anymore because they only last like 2\5 the charge cycles compared to LifeP04, and it get even worse compared to other batteries coming out right now. Really, putting those batteries in something with only a 150 mile range is kind of a shitty move, IMO. You'll need a new battery after 100,000 miles. Fine for a cheaper option I suppose, so long as the batteries are easy to replace and it won't cost $5,000 in labor.

Replies (1)

@artyom@piefed.social 2026-02-20 18:04

LOL yes it is. > The batteries are only 53kw\h in size That's the 150 mile model. No one is going to buy that. That's just the model they offer on the lowest ring of the price ladder. > because they want the full $7,500 tax credit ...there is no more tax credit. > No manufacturers want to use those batteries anymore because they only last like 2\5 the charge cycles compared to LifeP04 ...WTF are you talking about? Virtually everyone is still using them for much higher energy density and power. Almost no one is using LFP. > You'll need a new battery after 100,000 miles. Incorrect again. You should really learn more about what you're talking about before stating it so confidently.

Open ##1296356