Post #127430
2026-01-12 20:06 UTC
Replies (7)
-
@talin@mastodon.social 2026-01-12 20:49
@bendelarre I tend to think of AI as the new court astrologers - entities designed to tell the powerful what they want to hear. Court astrologers weren't stupid, they had math, even Galileo did it, and he's a hero of science. This doesn't make them any less wrong. Consider also that "plausibility" is what reinforcement learning trains AIs to do. Answers are evaluated not on truth or usefulness, but whether a human reviewer believed it. This makes the errors ever so much harder to spot.
-
@jupito@mastodontti.fi 2026-01-12 22:34
@bendelarre I heard capitalist robots are torturing human scientists in a similar way in order to produce "a technological solution" to the environmental collapse.
-
@ShadSterling@mastodon.social 2026-01-12 23:35
@bendelarre sounds consistent with the idea that what the investors really want is slaves
-
@tcsc@mastodon.social 2026-01-13 01:08
@bendelarre I view AI assistants as one of those guys who thinks admitting ignorance is a weakness and will always bullshit an answer rather than say "I don't know".
-
@aburka@hachyderm.io 2026-01-13 04:25
@bendelarre this ascribes personhood to statistical models in a way that feels off to me
-
@dueark@troet.cafe 2026-01-13 06:15
@bendelarre why not using your own brain instead of looking into the backmirror ai?
-
@darthkali@chaos.social 2026-01-13 06:42
@bendelarre AI is Like the „Measurement -App“ on the Smartphone.