Post #1225351
2026-04-17 01:39 UTC
@isaiah@mastodon.social Pre-Claude: I typically didn't make per bug/feature branches. Usually had two branches going, one for "next dot release" bug fixes and such, and another for whatever the longer term major release stuff I was working on. Would merge one into the other periodically when it made sense.
Post-Claude: I vibe coded my own Mac app that automates creating per-issue branches and worktrees, working on each in a separate Claude session, then merging and cleaning up when each one is done.
Replies (1)
-
@bwebster@mastodon.social 2026-04-17 01:47
@isaiah So, I guess I never did the per-issue branch thing before because a) I didn't do that much parallel work in the first place, and b) it was too much of a pain in the ass to do all the bookkeeping. But now that I do more in parallel (i.e. work on task A while Claude chugs on task B), and I've got it all automated, the per-issue workflow works quite well.