Post #1159019
2026-04-15 10:41 UTC
@stefan@akko.lightnovel-dungeon.de perhaps. I also agree, I don't use 90% of the features in KeePassXC.
As long as that fork ends up getting maintained I might switch.
I just need to store passwords, have some passable browser integration, and basic regular entry mangement like exporting/importing/sorting/moving/history.
Yesterday I ended up just unmasking KeePassXC to get it updated. But I'm not against switching to a fork at all.
Replies (1)
-
@quad@akko.quad.moe 2026-04-15 10:43
@stefan@akko.lightnovel-dungeon.de Honestly I'd say that the most advanced feature I use in KeePassXC is history to find an old revision of an entry. But that's a kdbx feature that basically all clients support afaik. But who knows, I didn't think that "sort by creation date" was an advanced feature either until I tried to use vaultwarden.