@threatresearch@infosec.exchange
Post #1135512
2024-03-08 19:29 UTC
Replies (9)
-
@Beachbum@mastodon.sdf.org 2024-03-08 19:36
@threatresearch Great info. TY.
-
@bloc@hachyderm.io 2024-03-08 20:39
@threatresearch Sadly more and more web applications break when used in Firefox. M$ and Google drive the web towards compatibility with Chrome-based browsers only. I'd wish a clear recommendation by BSI could change that, but I hardly think so.
-
@aeveltstra@mastodon.social 2024-03-08 21:16
@threatresearch Let's hope the BSI translates that into funding of Mozilla.
-
@odr_k4tana@infosec.exchange 2024-03-09 10:59
@threatresearch wouldn't reward that agency with too much attention tbh. They have been behind on every front and contribute close to nothing to the security landscape. Real privacy advice can (still) be accessed from the Federal Data Protection officer of GER (until he will be replaced soon, then it's probably the same story).
-
@MolemanPeter@neuromatch.social 2024-03-09 11:21
@threatresearch What about LibreWolf? @UlrikeHahn #firefox
-
@crazy2bike@fediworld.de 2024-03-10 10:43
@threatresearch@infosec.exchange #Firefox is the one and ony #browser 👍💪
-
@adingbatponder@fosstodon.org 2024-03-10 13:41
@threatresearch Chrome also appears to meet all the standards... why say only firefox?
-
@aho@mastodon.social 2024-03-10 16:15
@threatresearch for me it looked much that both Firefox and Chromium was okay, Chrome had some extra requirement depending on if you used a gamer-OS
-
@Arsimael@social.khajiit.de 2024-03-11 14:12
@threatresearch Do they know about Mozillas Backdoor called normandy?