Post #1103481
2026-04-05 11:53 UTC
Replies (9)
-
@greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo 2026-04-05 12:55
They’re not useful tools.
-
@panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 2026-04-05 13:10
If they’re so useful, why are they being forced on everyone, including by making them part of performance reviews? If they’re useful people will naturally use them.
-
@EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 2026-04-06 06:18
How about allowing AI to be rolled out and adopted organically instead of trying to gavage it down everyone’s throats?
-
@JigglySackles@lemmy.world 2026-04-05 15:56
I’d that tool didn’t come at the destructive costs involved, AI would be a lot more palatable.
-
@very_well_lost@lemmy.world 2026-04-05 15:29
What “usefulness” do you get out of them?
-
@VeloRama@feddit.org 2026-04-06 07:24
AI is not a useful tool, it’s a lock-in subscription that chains you to those billionaires. Fighting against AI is fighting against control by billionaires.
-
@thekerker@lemmy.world 2026-04-05 13:04
“AI Tools” describes both the product and the people who use them.
-
@Dumhuvud@programming.dev 2026-04-05 16:46
> not against useful tools Nobody's fighting against you guys. Why do sloperators have to take everything personally? Smh my head.
-
@StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 2026-04-05 15:53
You're screaming into the echo chamber, mate. Unless you're so rabidly anti-AI you believe and spread one of a few comforting, imaginary narratives, you'll be dog piled. I'm staunchly critical of AI, but won't pretend that it only consists of generative AI, that it still operates as poorly as it did years ago, nor that a disturbing percentage of the population either doesn't care about or actually supports that shit, so I get my share of insults. Being pro-AI won't get you much civility so set your expectations low. Unless you're trolling. Then you've nailed it.