← Feed

Posts

• Post #2167839

• Post #2167838

  “Why I Built My Own Camera App (And You Should Too)” https://blog.thepixelary.com/post/810496881791811584/why-i-built-my-own-camera-app-and-you-should-too

• Post #2167837

  “Image registration based on the Fourier-Mellin transform Log-polar transform” https://sthoduka.github.io/imreg_fmt/docs/log-polar-transform/

• Post #2167836

  I've been finding a few interesting books of late... Cole M, Scribner S. Culture and Thought; a Psychological Introduction. Wiley; 1974.

• Post #2167832

  “Exposing 'faceless' YouTubers pushing Canada to join the U.S.” https://www.cbc.ca/player/play/video/9.7187429

• Post #2122432

  “Why I Built My Own Camera App: RAW Data” https://blog.thepixelary.com/post/810503615233048576/raw-data-my-first-taste-of-unprocessed-beauty

• Post #1878306

  This is absolutely the finest work ever produced on LinkedIn. Marvel in all of its #pissoncarpet glory.

• Post #1073347

  The scientism around colour is vast and expansive. Gilchrist’s quote should be enough for folks to stop and take stock of what we think we know. Gilchrist, Alan. Seeing Black and White. Oxford University Press, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195187168.001.0001.

• Post #1073344

  Hats off to jpsalas… you have made some stunning virtual pinball tables!

• Post #1073343

  I had a discussion with yet another individual who believed in “wide gamut”. It is a very simple question; should an author be able to depict rainbows, prisms, dispersion, indirect interactions of materials, etc. without a wide gamut display? The answer is *of course* of course. Rethink how we are being sold nonsense to compel us to purchase things, and focus on what a picture is as a cultural artifact. “Wide gamut” is a bogus construct, founded upon a false belief of “simulacrum”.

• Post #1000584

  Every time some grifting corporate shill talks about “AI”. Every. Time.