Richard Elwes
richardelwes@mathstodon.xyz
<p>Mathematician & Writer in UK. Forthcoming book: Huge Numbers. Basic Books (April 2026).</p>
Posts
-
Post #2334342
RE: https://mathstodon.xyz/@icecolbeveridge/116453716046979073 I love it when the rules of sports competitions produce crazy incentives. Best of luck to Den Bosch who need to LOSE their football match this week-end in order to win promotion.
-
Post #2334335
This is a lovely bit of science communication by Simon Goodwin - using maths to understand an unexplained phenomenon in snooker. https://youtu.be/ZVleTuJE1mU?si=WKP2wayQ5ZhvutFK
-
Post #2334334
Ford Madox Ford once said: &quot;Open the book to page ninety-nine and read, and the quality of the whole will be revealed to you.&quot; It was fun applying the Page 99 Test to Huge Numbers. https://page99test.blogspot.com/2026/04/richard-elwess-huge-numbers.html
-
Post #2334332
After a book-swap with a fellow author, I am the proud owner of &quot;Dermatology Essentials for General Practice&quot; by the brilliant Dr Laura Manning. Recommended: an authoritative &amp; strangely compelling account of the seemingly endless ways in which human skin can turn weird, generously illustrated. scionpublishing.com/product/derm...
-
Post #2334327
RE: https://mathstodon.xyz/@aperiodical/116482126029247743 &quot;If you’ve ever interacted with mathematically-inclined children, you’ll have experienced at least the occasional obsession with big numbers&quot; Indeed, and some of those mathematically inclined children never grew out of it! Many thanks to @icecolbeveridge at @aperiodical for this nice review!
-
Post #2334324
This is a great article in @QuantaMagazine about “ultrafinitism” - a (today) niche philosophical position in mathematics which rejects the reality of infinity and that of numbers bigger than those we can construct and handle directly. https://www.quantamagazine.org/what-can-we-gain-by-losing-infinity-20260429/ …and yes this anti-Huge Number philosophy is discussed in my book Huge Numbers: “[Edward] Nelson died in 2014, but it’s fair to assume that he would have greatly disapproved of this bo...
-
Post #2334323
I had a great time chatting to Lynne Ware Peek about Huge Numbers, on KPCW Radio&#39;s Cool Science Radio show. https://www.kpcw.org/podcast/cool-science-radio/2026-04-30/why-huge-numbers-matter-more-than-you-think
-
Post #2334320
Here&#39;s me talking about Rubik&#39;s cubes on Numberphile. Ok fine, me talking about Rubik&#39;s cubes and Huge Numbers. How many different possible scrambles are there for puzzle cubes bigger than Rubik&#39;s classic? https://youtu.be/SAtFZPtbMpI?si=fHJyic1Pp-cbbBwT
-
Post #2334314
RE: https://mathstodon.xyz/@christianp/116525873450373884 A beautiful mathematical construction which deserves further study!
-
Post #2334308
RE: https://mathstodon.xyz/@wtgowers/116541479140154547 Some important thoughts on the future of mathematical research in the age of AI. Key question: “suppose that a mathematician solved a major problem by having a long exchange with an LLM in which the mathematician played a useful guiding role but the LLM did all the technical work and had the main ideas. Would we regard that as a major achievement of the mathematician?”
-
Post #2334306
RE: https://flipboard.com/@gizmodo/science-j3s1j3f9z/-/a-W3VsSleoReOhIMuejWRkVA%3Aa%3A1876139665-%2F0 Thanks to Gayoung Lee at @Gizmodo for this great write-up of a fun conversation!
-
Post #926398
First media review for Huge Numbers! Emily Conover in Science News writes: &quot;It’s a delightful survey of the field of googology, the study of large numbers.... It’s a joy to marvel at how boundaries have been broken time and again, thanks to the creative, intrepid explorers of the biggest numbers known.&quot; https://www.sciencenews.org/article/huge-numbers-book-math-googology