Pascal Costanza
pascal_costanza@functional.cafe
<p>I am a senior software and HPC research engineer, with a PhD in computer science, located in Belgium. I am very interested in programming languages (C, C++, Common Lisp, Go, Java, Julia, Python, Rust, Scheme, and others). I am an expert in parallel programming, metaprogramming, bioinformatics, and sparse computing. There is more information about me at <a href="http://p-cos.net" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no"><span class="invisible">http://</span><span class="">p-cos.net</span><span class="invisible"></span></a></p>
Posts
-
Post #3556502
“One man's constant is another man's variable.” - Alan J. Perlis
-
Post #660795
I have now seen this a few times in mailing lists: There is some discussion with an explicit or implicit question, somebody asks some random LLM and then posts its answer into the discussion, without double-checking it. Then somebody else double-checks it, shows that it&#39;s wrong, or at least in need of some correction. All of this is a waste of bandwidth, and frankly speaking just impolite. No matter what your stance on LLMs is, anybody can ask an LLMs themselves, there is no added value...