← Feed

Posts

• Post #2946457

  Maybe, but at this point the few oligarchs would be parias in their own home. And it would be easy to eliminate them.

• Post #2946406

  Do you realize that this way the volume of the business would be a lot smaller, right ? And being rich means nothing is you have not a use for your money. You make AI and robotics to take care of everything you need, good, now think who pay, what it is needed and who would do the work for keeping the AI and robots in a working status. Hint: not the few common people that at this point have no money for anything else that some food, if any, since you automated everything. It would be better...

• Post #2928025

  Then you don’t understand slavery deeply-enough: They can outright remove-human-validity-from all lives except their-own, & they’ll still have “business” happening. True, but a very limited one. In a situation where you need to continually grow, removing all the human side of business will end with bankrupcy. Citizens are not required outside of oligarchs… Citizens are required, oligarchs can prosper only because there is something that produce their money. You remove the citizen...

• Post #868046

  Yeah, because it so much more smart to just buy another car if someone in your family need a breathalyzer to drive just because of a beer.

• Post #768107

  Building on US tech means the US generally has control over whether you can deploy your military assets, and gives a foreign, militaristic/fascist trending power, deep insights into your military operations. Pretending like these risks are not greater than, or at the very least on par with, “its hard to integrate systems/build our own” is silly. I know, but it is not what I said. I only pointed out that simple saying “its hard to integrate systems/build our own” did not automagically means...