← Feed

Posts

• Post #860756

  Kaplunk Percent of 88 to total (328) = 26.8% Percent of 67 to total (328) = 20.4% Percent of 55 to total (328) = 16.8% Percent of 118 to total (328) = 36%

• Post #860755

  @bsletten Shocked that I haven't heard that before. Thanks.

• Post #860754

  Power to the people 'cause the people want peace

• Post #860753

  Skunk Percent of 51 to total (263) = 19.4% Percent of 101 to total (263) = 38.4% Percent of 59 to total (263) = 22.4% Percent of 52 to total (263) = 19.8%

• Post #860752

  @pluralistic Do you think Zitron's "midwit" is smarter than a dimwit? That's the way I read it. Clearly not praise, either way.

• Post #860751

  Wango Percent of 105 to total (276) = 38% Percent of 51 to total (276) = 18.5% Percent of 61 to total (276) = 22.1% Percent of 59 to total (276) = 21.4%

• Post #860750

  Not a wango, but maybe close? Percent of 68 to total (285) = 23.9% Percent of 97 to total (285) = 34% Percent of 60 to total (285) = 21.1% Percent of 60 to total (285) = 21.1%

• Post #860749

  Fantastic interview of @pluralistic by Joe Reis, the author who runs the Utah data engineering meet-up (among other things). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_ktaPutkjM

• Post #860748

  @fatsam In addition to "how", I'm worried about "that".

• Post #860747

  @nyrath Wow, one data center right here in Utah, in nearby West Jordan. If I see those dogs wandering around downtown, I'm heading the other direction.

• Post #860746

  Low-scoring monstrosity Percent of 43 to total (186) = 23.1% Percent of 42 to total (186) = 22.6% Percent of 38 to total (186) = 20.4% Percent of 63 to total (186) = 33.9%

• Post #860745

  Ah, close to 4H Percent of 65 to total (253) = 25.7% Percent of 57 to total (253) = 22.5% Percent of 76 to total (253) = 30% Percent of 55 to total (253) = 21.7%

• Post #860744

  Choom Percent of 70 to total (305) = 23% Percent of 73 to total (305) = 23.9% Percent of 107 to total (305) = 35.1% Percent of 55 to total (305) = 18%

• Post #860743

  @molly0xfff Oh, my goodness. Did you do all that? What went inside?

• Post #860742

  @stefan Figure the answer will be, "Cash or check?" 😞

• Post #860741

  Wango tango Percent of 54 to total (268) = 20.1% Percent of 68 to total (268) = 25.4% Percent of 101 to total (268) = 37.7% Percent of 45 to total (268) = 16.8%

• Post #860740

  @StefanEJones Clearly😉 the Lord's work. Not sure which Lord, exactly, but definitely so.

• Post #860739

  @MissConstrue Braver by far than I. Plumbing & electrical I leave to the professionals.

• Post #860738

  During an ML class, the instructor thanked me for responding, then said, "But who knows, maybe you're a Claude agent or something." I replied, "More a clod than a Claude". Kind of funny

• Post #749349

  @pluralistic "For these AI boosters, the point isn't to create an AI that can do the work as well as a person – it's to condition the world to accept the lower-quality work that will come from a chatbot." It's like "you get what you pay for" is being used as justification for terrible quality, instead of warning people away from suspiciously-cheap products.

• Post #36073

  @pluralistic@mamot.fr Plus: "AI is the asbestos in the walls of our technological society, stuffed there with wild abandon by a finance sector and tech monopolists run amok." Evocative enough to make me cough.