Benedikt Bramböck
bramboeck@typo.social
<p>Typeface designer and font technology specialist · taking care of fonts, workflows and knowledge transfer · <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://typo.social/@TypeMedia" class="u-url mention">@<span>TypeMedia</span></a></span> 14|15 · he/him</p><p><a href="https://typo.social/tags/TypeDesign" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>TypeDesign</span></a> <a href="https://typo.social/tags/Typography" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>Typography</span></a> <a href="https://typo.social/tags/Fonts" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>Fonts</span></a> <a href="https://typo.social/tags/Type" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>Type</span></a> <a href="https://typo.social/tags/Tools" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>Tools</span></a> <a href="https://typo
Posts
-
Post #1764558
@lttrspc Also seems like there is a basic misunderstanding about look (“typeface”) and underlying characters (“text”). In that way it reminds me of that “NSA safe” typeface from 2013: https://walkerart.org/magazine/sang-mun-defiant-typeface-nsa-privacy/