← Feed

Posts

• Post #4179175

  I’ve seen this perspective a few times, feels wooly to me. What definition of natural are you thinking of here?

• Post #3773183

  As I’m sure you know, for the items that enforcement is improbably/impossible, their inclusion isn’t about enforcement.

• Post #3305409

  Utterly aside from the general content of this thread. I know nothing of the pieces printed or their leanings, nor is it relevant for the purposes of this response. That argument is the weakest of sauces, drizzled over a disappointing bad-faith steak. A single article doesn’t define a whole paper (nor was that claimed). A papers’ reputation doesn’t give them a free pass for printing something outside of their normal editorial quality control. Argue the actual claims, this bad faith def...

• Post #571408

  They even had an ending in the movie that was closer to the original , but they cut it/changed it because it didn’t test well. I’d guess that was because it was an ending that followed the original storyline and didn’t make sense without the rest of the movie also following the original storyline. spoiler It turns out (or is apparent in general) that the “zombies” are sentient/sapient and to them he’s the monster in the dark(or daylight as is the case here), from their point of view he’s basi...