@truthbait@noauthority.social @Twig@clew.lol @AlphaKiloPapa@noauthority.social @bonifartius@noauthority.social @Clambino@noauthority.social @Economic_Hitman@noauthority.social @eriner@noauthority.social @fkq1q2r2@noauthority.social @gr1mr33p3r@noauthority.social @Nicktherat@noauthority.social @Twig@noauthority.social @RatPoster@poa.st @adam@psyopshop.com @Coyote@shitposter.world @jeffcliff@shitposter.world @FaggotTourney@tsundere.love @Wiz@tsundere.love >RatPoster’s enabling/validating response to monkyyy’s conditional vote occurred after the voting period had already closed This is true. >meaning it cannot retroactively validate or regularize the original condition This is not. This is part of why it was annoying to count the votes the first time around. We did indeed have to check whether or not Colleen liked Ratposter's recent heinous posts, and we found that she did. Why would you expect someone in this tournament to validate that by default? This is an anti-popularity contest. You and Ratposter are just having fun with it in good spirit.