No. The fact that people still commit atrocities does not mean those atrocities were never rejected. People still murder. People still torture. People still commit genocide. That does not make murder, torture, or genocide accepted principles. Collective punishment was explicitly rejected in international humanitarian law after the horrors of the last century. And “but the Muslim world” is not a defense of your argument. It is just pointing at someone else. You defended collective punishment. You minimized the suffering of innocent civilians. You justified that suffering as the consequence of political decisions made by a population decades ago. Those were your words. They are still sitting there for everyone to read. You cannot erase what you argued by pretending you argued something else.