Post by @hendrik@palaver.p3x.de

@hendrik@palaver.p3x.de

2026-09-04 08:43 UTC

Yes, certainly a bit weird. But the way he talks and acts, I strongly doubt that’s his opinion. Dunno why people give it as much importance. But it’s basically saying he (or anyone) thinks there’s a “but” to genocide. Yes, it’s genocide, but …. is a really stupid opinion. And you can’t draw any conclusions from that. Somehow I believe he’s smarter than that. I mean I can’t back it up, it’s mostly my opinion, but come on… he isn’t that stupid or sells out to dictators that frequently? Also the article claims it’s been 2 years before the atrocities. But I can find news articles scolding him in 2017 already for saying the US is complicit in what happens in the West Bank and Gaza… and something should be done about it. Back then it was reallocate (at least some of) the money that goes towards Israel and give it to the people in Gaza (as humanitarian aid). Somehow none of this aligns.

Replies (1)

@destructdisc@lemmy.world 2026-09-04 08:54

But the way he talks and acts, I strongly doubt that’s his opinion Then why is he constantly spouting it in public where everyone can hear him and be convinced that yes, that is his opinion that the Palestinians wouldn’t be genocided if they just rolled over and let Israel take everything from them And you can’t draw any conclusions from that. Course you can. The conclusion is that he’s a Zionist. and something should be done about it. Back then it was reallocate the money that goes towards Israel and give it to the people in Gaza (as humanitarian aid) The thing that should be done about it is to call for the dissolution and revocation of recognition for the Zionist identity. He’s not doing that, he’s not coming even close to that or to expressing his support for the Palestinian people to have control over (all of) their own land. Lip service is what he’s doing to maintain the illusion that he’s “leftist”, and lip service doesn’t do a damn thing.

Open ##4674341