2026-10-19 05:31 UTC
They don’t have to be special, they just have to be allowed, which depends on local laws that restrict their weight, speed, and other things.
This is your opinion and I disagree. They’re free to sort it out with the heavy machinery on the tarmac, though, if and only if they’re taxed as other vehicles are taxed too.
This whole line of argument misses my point that giving workers a share of the benefits of innovation would be better than treating the innovations as the enemy.
We’re talking about uber eats, do you think they will give any worker a share of any benefit? Get real.
Replies (2)
-
@mcv@lemmy.zip 2026-10-19 05:36
There’s a difference between do and should. They should. That requires regulation.
-
@LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 2026-10-19 05:41
Companies will only give workers a share of the benefits of innovation if they’re forced to - a goal I’d rather try to achieve than call it impossible. People once took the same attitude about all sorts of real things - worker safety rules, food quality standards, the right to unionize… even the idea that people would obey lines painted on the road was originally scoffed at. And yet we have all of those. So get real yourself.